December 3, 2022

Representative Peter Meijer, who voted to impeach former President Donald Trump and also lost the primary last week, said Sunday on CBS’ “Face the Nation” that Democrats’ decision to run ads to help his Trump-backed opponent was likely backfiring “in an amazing way.” “.

Brennan: Michigan Congressman Peter Major is one of ten Republican members of the House of Representatives who voted to impeach former President Trump in the wake of the attack on the Capitol. Last Tuesday, he lost his first race to a rival that Trump endorsed. Congressman Major is with us this morning from Grand Rapids, Michigan. Good morning Congressman. The person who won that primaries is an election denier named John Gibbs, who is backed by former President Trump. Why do you think Michigan Republicans prefer him?

Major: Well, good morning, Margaret. Like I said, I lost primary and that’s on me. I take responsibility for that. But it’s important to note that it wasn’t just former President Trump, who was in this race, there was about half a million dollars the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spent in its first midterm spending of 2022 to help bolster it. So we had a scenario where not only was the former president biased against me, but in a rare display of bipartisan unity, Nancy Pelosi and the House Democratic Campaign Committee also united to try to get me out of the ballot. Now, this only highlights the irony and hypocrisy in our politics today. And frankly, it would be unknown what that ultimate effect was, but the fact that we have the establishment left and right-wing extremists locking arms in a common cause paints a very telling picture of where our politics are in 2022.

Brennan “Well, what you’re talking about there’s an ad that the campaigns of the Democratic Congressional Committee spent $325,000 on promoting Mr. Gibbs, which is roughly the equivalent of what Gibbs spent on his entire campaign. That’s what you’re referring to, that’s what our viewers are looking at there. But Do you think this announcement really made a difference?I mean the Democrats don’t vote in these primaries, they’re Republicans, so why did the Michigan Republicans fall for this announcement?

Major: Well, you know, I think there’s an obvious question about efficacy here, of course, and at the end of the day, Republican voters are going to cast their votes as they see fit. I should point out that this ad was not targeted – it wasn’t running on MSNBC, it wasn’t running where Democratic voters might see it, and it was targeted in places to try to sway and persuade Republican primary voters to try to give my defiant primaries Push up and over again. And I must add that my defeat was about 3%, out of the 100,000+ votes cast, we lost by less than 4,000, and I think it’s important to remember, when you have an election very close like this. And he’s clearly competing against very strong headwinds, with a pro-Trump rival in a party President Trump still has more than 75% approval. This is a letter that focuses on the gist of what I have been able to achieve in the position. I am proud that our office is on track to set a record for the largest number of bills signed by a new law student, such that these accomplishments are lost in our current personal politics, lost in a broader sense. And I think that’s one of the primary challenges we face as a state, and that, frankly, frustrates Michigan families. We’re dealing with a politics that doesn’t reward substance that doesn’t reward, you know, reality. This focuses on rhetoric and personality above all else.

Brennan: Do you think the Democrats are going to get what they paid here? right? I mean, they are betting that it will be easier to defeat them. Mr. Gibbs from you. Is your district going to democrat?

re \ come back. Major: It’s important to note that this is an area where President Biden won in 2020 by nearly nine points, and I was one of five Republicans running for reelection in seats where — President Biden won the 2020 election by eight points or more. And so while I think there has certainly been cynical calculus with Democrats getting involved, this is a risky strategy. It’s a dangerous strategy. When President Biden’s approval is at rock bottom, it’s hard to see that strategy — it’s easy to see this strategy backfiring in an amazing way, which is all the more reason we shouldn’t embrace the zero-sum policy idea. We shouldn’t embrace this — this idea that if we can keep a problem alive, we keep it festering, but we’re able to gain a marginal advantage in the process, that somehow means a victory. I think it’s a dark and cynical way of looking at our politics, and frankly, 48% of the primary voters here rejected it. They stood against such disdain that they were focusing on someone who was working to achieve results.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *